[wornoutshoes]

i'm in the middle of a debate with my younger brother. he claims that meucci is known for some amazing inlays and i don't doubt that. i've seen some of their work. but he is trying to say that this cue the gambler 2 joker is entirely made of inlay work. i'd beleive the dice. it's a nice cue. but the cards? hell no. painted all the way.

settle this. anyone know for sure? i think there's got to be at least one meucci dealer on here that would know.


http://www.budgetcues.com/meucci-pool-cue-...ler-2-joker.htm

[Leftoverchinese]

Way to embellish what I said. I read somewhere that it's an inlay. I know Pelican and Fast both are/were dealers, so one of them can answer this for us.

[wornoutshoes]

faltering in our decision are we?


you were standing over my shoulder when i typed that.

i didn't embellish. next time, don't try to save face on the net, just tap me on the shoulder and say, "hey, i dind't mean that, i just said that i heard it was inlay."

[Pelican]

Sorry Shoes, it's not paint.

Pel

[Leftoverchinese]

Thanks Pel, You wouldn't happen to know if that stick comes in a red dot or if they make a Gambler 3 joker would you? Seriously, I'm never one for insanely fancy inlay work, but jokers have always been a little special too me. If I could get it in a red dot, I may think about getting Meucci #2

Quote

wornoutshoes wrote:
you were standing over my shoulder when i typed that.

Yeah yeah, I did mention it and you clearly changed it a bit, but whatever. Not worth squabbling over.

[wornoutshoes]

not paint?



ps: where's the fun in a brother if you can't squabble?