Who likes to gamble at pool
#1
Posted 11 November 2005 - 06:32 PM
#2
Posted 12 November 2005 - 01:39 PM
Pel
#3
Posted 13 November 2005 - 08:33 AM
#4
Posted 13 November 2005 - 09:23 PM
Pel
#5
Posted 13 November 2005 - 11:37 PM
but yea i think fast larry has covered this topic in some threads a while back. just do a search and it should pop up somewhere.
happy shooting
home, can see the finish line, don't spit da bit, begin beating the ass
with your riding whip and yell out like Tarzan, who's yo daddy. When
she screams FL, don't take it too hard, life goes on.
#6
Posted 14 November 2005 - 09:58 AM
I would love to hear everybody's opinion on this subject.
As for me, I'll play for $5 here and there, but I stop after I lose $15 or so. I think that's only happened once, but I try to keep a limit so I don't let emotions get me broke ;-)
#7
Posted 16 November 2005 - 09:56 AM
#8
Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:01 PM
That is how you lose friends.
The Power Source Traveling Pool School. To see my web page come alive click here: www.fastlarrypool.com
#9
Posted 26 November 2005 - 06:10 PM
peoples money, because if they risked there own they'd probably fall apart like the rest of us. If two players of equal skill level are gambling and one has a backer and the other is risking his own money bet on the player with the backer.
So if you think you have to gamble to be great, I can't say I agree with that, I know alot of great players who never play with there own money but yet they are still great players.
Now lets look at other sports does Tiger Woods gamble? Does Wayne Gretzky gamble? Did Joe montanna Gamble. Noooo! But yet these are some of the greatest players that ever lived.
So if you don't have to gamble to be great at other sports why do you have to gamble to be great at pool? I don't think you do I believe it's a great
misconception and tons of players are running around risking hard earned money because they think that's what you have to do to be great!
But I do believe you need to compete as much as possible in tournaments or leagues.
[ Edited by Sodapop on 2005/11/26 18:15 ]
#10
Posted 26 November 2005 - 09:04 PM
As pool players do not have ready access to such tools and tournaments are not run24-7 we have to gamble.
Gambling provides various amounts of pressure(read wager sizes) to remove you from your comfort zone and keeps you under pressure for extended period of time(usually much longer than a tournament), thus allowing cracks and weaknesses to surface(ie. kicking).
Observant people diagnose these problem and search out the information to make the nessasary repairs and spend the time needed to complete them.
This is the difference between pros and us hopefuls!
Also to the other statement about backers even if someone else is putting up the money if you don't win you don't get your share and might not eat, or possibly have to sleep in your car as opposed to a motel room, etc.
I do think real men bet their own cash!
Just my opinion
Bern
#11
Posted 26 November 2005 - 09:51 PM
tournament players who don't do good gambling. To be a top pro you have to win tournaments, in gambling you only have to beat one player to win, and most gamblers only play suckers they know they can beat or at least have a chance to beat.
I believe it takes alot more skill and stamina to win a pro tournament then it does to beat one guy. To win a pro tournament you have to beat 6 to 10 world class players.
As far as not enough tournaments that might be true in Canada where we live, but in the states there are tournaments 7 days a week.
What it takes to be a top pro is move to where the best players live and play against them as much as possible.
Tell me how many gamblers would be willing to fork out a few grand of there own money to play Archer, Strickland or Reyes not to many, so the only way your going to play and beat these guys is in a tournament.

Help













